Antis, take a good read.

http://www.attractedtochildren.org/2010/why-you-wont-locate-paedophiles-in-your-area-roderik-muit-jack-mcclellan-marthijn-uittenbogaard-norbert-de-jonge-perverted-justice-vigilantes

This is an excellent article, it's spot on. Your hate and intolerance simply serves to put children in danger. And it's stupid and unfair on innocent people who are harmless.

I haven't looked fully over the rest of the site, so I dunno what else it advocates at this time. My opinions are not necessarily the same as the whole sites.

Any reasonable people who have any sympathy for these antis and believe that we are horrible people, take a look at the comments.

"The writer is obviously a pedo…children are not ATTRACTED to adults. Nobody has a RIGHT to look at them sexually… Children are not play thingies…A child does not want you perverted attention…How dare you think you have the right to support “boylovers”. If any man or woman ever loved at my son, my innocent son, inappropriately I will shoot him through the head…the back of his head cause I dont want to see his/her evil eyes…"

I'll break this down.
Assertion #1: The writer is obviously a pedo.
Whilst I personally get the feeling this is the case, it is by no means "obvious". The writer is someone with a lot of common sense. Being OK with paedos, and not hating them with a vicious and inexplicable anger, but seeing that it's just how we're born and we can't help it does not make you a paedo. Standing up for us doesn't make you a paedo either, it makes you someone who is willing to help the guy who's being picked on and bullied around. Though to antis you might as well be a paedo, since you don't want to kill us.

Assertion #2: Children are not ATTRACTED to adults.
For the most part I believe this is correct. It is however irrelevant, since the article as far as I can see makes no mention of children being attracted to adults. It is focused on how hatred and malice drive us underground so you have no idea who is and who isn't.

Assertion #3: Nobody has the RIGHT to look at them sexually.
I personally believe that we do not have any inherent rights. The rights we have are given to us by law. Maybe I'll talk about that later. For now, I will take the comment to mean either that no-one should have the right (currently the law doesn't attempt to stop us from "looking sexually"), or that no-one should do it.

But why? Our looking and our thinking has absolutely no effect on that child. What if I said that no-one has the right to think of anyone they can't have sexually? So, that means all married men and women (who don't plan on having an affair or divorcing) are no longer allowed to admire any other person, or think anything even remotely sexual about anyone other than their husbands again, ever. Or, for a better comparison, you are not allowed to do that to anyone who you really have no hope of obtaining (Eg. famous pop stars, sports people, TV personalities etc.)

2 Questions:
1. Is that feasible? Could you honestly do that?
2. Why should you have to? If you look and think "nice ass", does that harm someone who is not interested in you? Is that somehow harmful? Even if you were able to suppress that sort of thing, what good will that do anyone?
Though as the first question implies, I doubt that you could actually do that. Paedos are not some sort of super/sub-human entities, we have thoughts we can't help too.

So not only does the "rights" of it not matter since those sort of thoughts are uncontrollable, but even if they were controllable, see no reason why I should suppress myself and push my sexuality away just because some people are squeamish. Nobody will ever know anyway.

Assertions #4 and #5: Children are not play thingies…A child does not want you perverted attention…
Ok. If this is talking about the actual article, neither of them are in any way relevant. As a moral argument, the article does not imply that they should be used as such. I personally would kill actual child abusers myself. I feel the same way anyone else does. Though I really can't help what I am. My thoughts are in my head and I (like most other paedos) keep them there.

Though children in fact do like attention. If I give them attention in a completely normal way (as any adult would) and I happen to get a certain pleasure out of that, again it doesn't hurt anyone and I enjoy it immensely, so the same arguments as above apply.

Implication #1: You have no right to support boylovers.
Ok, so it depends how you take "BoyLovers". It does not mean that they have acted on their urges. To me, and I believe most others, This refers to a paedophile who is interested in boys. I would be a "GirlLover" by that. Though the term I believe can refer exclusively to those who advocate age of consent reform. However, this is an uncommon usage I believe (I could be wrong, I'm actually sort of new to the paedo community, and I only pick up what I see people use online).

Addressing this by using the former definition:
They have every legal right to support BoyLovers. Should they? Well yes, as I've mentioned, being able to talk about it, knowing there are others out there, it helps. Supporting other paedos is a possible wanted side effect of this blog. It helps protect children and helps make life a bit easier for those who need it.

Addressing it by the latter definition:
They have every legal right to support BoyLovers. Should they? Well, yes, if they genuinely believe that it would benefit society and the children. That is really an issue of points of view. I personally don't believe in significant AoC reform, as I've said. Though I know some people do, and I respect their opinions. If you actually think that that is what's best, do support it. Though I would say that it would be wrong to support it out of a selfish desire to do things to young children. If that is the motivation I would say stop.

The next bit I personally find sickening, and shows the kind of mentality of the people who spout this hate:
Assertion #6: If any man or woman ever loved at my son, my innocent son, inappropriately I will shoot him through the head…
I believe it is safe to assume that "loved" was a mistype, as the sentence makes no sense, so I will replace it with "looked" which fits more with the whole post up to now, and makes much more sense:
Assertion #6: If any man or woman ever looked at my son, my innocent son, inappropriately I will shoot him through the head…
I fully understand the whole "concerned parent" thing. But this is awful, considering who they are making out to be the bad guys. You would commit murder just because someone had an errant thought that could not be helped? You would destroy someones life, a human life, because of a sexual orientation that they may well have had the strength and morality not to act on? I sincerely hope this was a moment of rage, however I have seen similar comments on anti websites and posts. It saddens me a little that someone hates me so passionately for what I am that they would want to kill me and others like me based on something I have resisted for years and years, and will continue to resist until I die. This, and the examples in the article, show just how uncaring antis are. No matter what I could give to children and other people too, no matter that I will never hurt them, I am better off dead, because they said so. They are not pro-child as some claim, they are anti-paedophile.

Note, an anti is not just anyone who doesn't like pedos, it's those who have such a venomous hatred that it leads to them to destroying peoples lives, or wanting them destroyed, purely due to their attraction.

Assertion #7: the back of his head cause I dont want to see his/her evil eyes…
Translation #1: The back of his head, because I'm a coward who can't face the person I am about to destroy. Because I can't explain why, I am just going to because I hate them.

I think that about does it for tonight. For any ordinary person out there, just see these nasty hateful comments. These are the people who put out all this propaganda about how all paedos hate children and just want to rape them all. It isn't true, they just want to make you as hate filled as they are.

And in case anyone wants to e-mail me privately my E-mail is in my profile.

Oyasuminasai ^_^