The counter-productivity of child abuse

Ok, so I often think about how counter productive it is for antis to do some of the things they do. Though the other day I was thinking about child abuse being counter productive.

If people abuse children, that obviously alienates non-paedos. It's why paedophilia is so heavily outlawed in society. Which means that we have less freedom, and talk of that sort of thing is repressed. From what I've observed, a number of the people who abuse are the type who think the kid wants it. So if they didn't abuse children now, then there wouldn't be anything like the number of cases, and I think society would become more accepting. Now, if their own ideas are right (I don't think they are but they presumably do) then if this happened then it would allow children to be more exposed to sexual stuff and, again, if their theory was right, the children could say how much they wanted it and people would be more happy to allow it. You will always get the people who want to ban things purely because they are "ick" though. So idk. This is really just something I was wondering about on the bus. Just wondering if really, by abusing children, those doing it are limiting themselves and all of us.

I suppose it's possible though that a lot of them don't care about expanding their options and improving their own ability to speak out, and the rest of us who don't abuse. They may only care about the things they do. But I doubt it's the majority of cases. But then I really don't know.